On Sun, Oct 08, 2017 at 12:53:11AM +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Oct 07, 2017 at 05:19:34PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 10:51:30AM +0200, Frédéric Danis wrote: > > > UART devices is expected to be enumerated by SerDev subsystem. > > > > > > During ACPI scan, serial devices behind SPI, I2C or UART buses are not > > > enumerated, allowing them to be enumerated by their respective parents. > > > > > > Rename *spi_i2c_slave* to *serial_bus_slave* as this will be used for serial > > > devices on serial buses (SPI, I2C or UART). > > > > > > On Macs an empty ResourceTemplate is returned for uart slaves. > > > Instead the device properties "baud", "parity", "dataBits", "stopBits" are > > > provided. Add a check for "baud" in acpi_is_serial_bus_slave(). > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Frédéric Danis <frederic.danis.oss@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > So just to reiterate what I just mentioned in a comment to one of Hans's > > hci_bcm patches: > > > > This one would silently break PM for such devices on any system which > > does not have serdev enabled (as the corresponding platform devices > > would no longer be registered). And with serdev enabled, hciattach > > (btattach) would start failing as the tty device would no longer be > > registered (but I assume everyone is aware of that, and fine with it, by > > now). > > > > Perhaps the hci_bcm driver should start depending on > > SERIAL_DEV_CTRL_TTYPORT when ACPI is enabled? > > ACPI and DT both need SERIAL_DEV_CTRL_TTYPORT to work properly, > since SERIAL_DEV_CTRL_TTYPORT is the only controller implemented > for serdev. If any other controller is implemented that one could > also be used. Not for hci_bcm, right? This particular driver specifically depends on SERIAL_DEV_CTRL_TTYPORT for the ACPI devices and not just any (future) serdev controller (or currently working systems soon breaks silently). I don't think the same is true for the DT case where we do not already have child nodes defined in firmware (and in fact, this driver did not really support DT before serdev). > I wonder if we should just hide SERIAL_DEV_CTRL_TTYPORT and enable > it together with SERDEV. I suspect that we won't see any other > controller (it would be a UART device, that is not registered as > tty device) in the next few years and the extra option seems to > confuse people. I agree that it is somewhat confusing. But now that we have both, perhaps simply having SERIAL_DEV_CTRL_TTYPORT default to "y" when SERIAL_DEV_BUS is selected could be a compromise. The Kconfig entry might need to be amended as well (e.g. if only to mention that you need to select a controller as well). And the bluetooth uart drivers already depend on SERIAL_DEV_BUS. Johan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
