Hi Rafael, >>>> This patch allows SerDev module to manage serial devices declared as >>>> attached to an UART in ACPI table. >>>> >>>> acpi_serdev_add_device() callback will only take into account entries >>>> without enumerated flag set. This flags is set for all entries during >>>> ACPI scan, except for SPI and I2C serial devices, and for UART with >>>> 2nd patch in the series. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Frédéric Danis <frederic.danis.oss@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> --- >>>> drivers/tty/serdev/core.c | 99 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- >>>> 1 file changed, 94 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) >>> >>> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> so how do we get these changes upstream? If the serdev changes alone do not cause any harm, I am almost proposing taking them through bluetooth-next tree and only leave only the ACPI change to the ACPI maintainers. > > That would be fine by me. I can take the serdev patch too, though. having both patches go via ACPI tree might be simplest. Greg, any objections from you? Regards Marcel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
