Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] minitty: a minimal TTY layer alternative for embedded systems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2017-04-02 at 11:55 -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Apr 2017, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> 
> > 
> > +Cc people, who have a key roles in all TTY stuff (btw, why you did
> > miss them?
> 
> I used what MAINTAINERS and get_maintainer.pl gave me.
> 

I didn't see this until now as I'm mid house move so not following a
lot of l/k.

If you need a tiny tiny tty layer console for some kind of not quite
mini-Linux please just steal the one from Fuzix or something similar
thats only a couple of K in size and only needs extremely simple send
byte/rx byte type handlers.

Alternatively just compile out tty support entirely. What do you
actually need ? Console doesn't need tty layer and if you have a
debug/management interface that doesn't have to be tty and text based
either.

Being able to compile out tty support would be useful, having two tty
layers that are intertwined and now both totally unmaintable is not
IMHO progress.

Alan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux PPP]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linmodem]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Kernel for ARM]

  Powered by Linux