On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 4:55 PM, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On 16/03/17 13:36, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 05:56:53PM +0530, Vignesh R wrote: >>> Using dev_name() as irq name during request_irq() might be misleading in >>> case of serial over PCI. Therefore use a better alternative name for >>> identifying serial port irqs as "serial" appended with serial_index of >>> the port. This ensures that "serial" string is always present in irq >>> name while port index will help in distinguishing b/w different ports. >> >> Wouldn't it be better to use the device name (iow, ttySx) rather than >> "serialx" ? >> >> Maybe a helper function in serial_core.c to format the device name into >> a supplied string, which can be re-used elsewhere, eg, uart_report_port() >> and uart_suspend_port(). IOW: >> >> const char *uart_port_name(char *buf, size_t n, struct uart_driver *drv, >> struct uart_port *port) >> { >> snprintf(buf, n, "%s%d", drv->dev_name, >> drv->tty_driver->name_base + port->line); >> >> return buf; >> } >> >> which means you can do this: >> >> char name[16]; >> >> request_irq(..., uart_port_name(name, sizeof(name), driver, port), ...) >> >> which also avoids the allocation. > > ...and makes 'cat /proc/interrupts' particularly fun later: > > 8: 0 GICv2 72 Level � �h ����V! > > Unless a suitably long-lived string already exists somewhere else in the > serial core, the allocation is unavoidable, although kasprintf() (or its > devm_ variant) might make matters a little simpler. What prevents us to create a field in uart_port (uart8250_port?) where we put the uart_port_name() for future use as long as uart_port is alive? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html