Re: [PATCH v2] tty: pl011: Work around QDF2400 E44 stuck BUSY bit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Christopher Covington wrote:
Nothing needs QDF2400 erratum 44. Software should try to detect the presence
of the erratum. So I think qdf2400_e44_detected or qdf2400_e44_present would
make sense. But those suffixes don't add substantial value in my opinion.

I'd be okay with qdf2400_e44_detected or qdf2400_e44_present. I think it's a lot clearer. Another idea is "has_qdf2400_e44".

--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux PPP]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linmodem]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Kernel for ARM]

  Powered by Linux