Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] serial: core: make static analyzer happy about locks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2016-11-10 at 14:59 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 06:26:57PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > Static analyzer can not see balanced locking if the lock is acquired
> > and
> > released conditionally. Add __acquire() and __release() markings in
> > the right
> > locations so that sparse isn't tripped up on the conditional
> > locking.
> > 
> > drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c:131:17: warning: context imbalance
> > in 'uart_stop' - unexpected unlock
> > include/linux/spinlock.h:362:9: warning: context imbalance in
> > 'uart_start' - unexpected unlock
> > include/linux/spinlock.h:362:9: warning: context imbalance in
> > 'uart_put_char' - unexpected unlock
> > include/linux/spinlock.h:362:9: warning: context imbalance in
> > 'uart_write' - unexpected unlock
> > include/linux/spinlock.h:362:9: warning: context imbalance in
> > 'uart_write_room' - unexpected unlock
> > include/linux/spinlock.h:362:9: warning: context imbalance in
> > 'uart_chars_in_buffer' - unexpected unlock
> > include/linux/spinlock.h:362:9: warning: context imbalance in
> > 'uart_flush_buffer' - unexpected unlock
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c | 4 ++++
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
> > b/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
> > index f2303f3..ff90c8e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
> > @@ -82,6 +82,8 @@ static inline void uart_port_deref(struct
> > uart_port *uport)
> >  		struct uart_port *__uport = uart_port_ref(state);	
> > \
> >  		if (__uport)					
> > 	\
> >  			spin_lock_irqsave(&__uport->lock, flags);	
> > \
> > +		else						
> > 	\
> > +			__acquire(&__uport->lock);			
> > \
> 
> That doesn't make much logical sense.  Yes, I know __acquire is just a
> crazy macro, but really, look at what you just wrote and tell me that
> someone who doesn't know what __acquire does, would instantly think
> this
> is a null pointer dereference.
> 
> Please fix.

Do you mean add comments here in the code?

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Intel Finland Oy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux PPP]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linmodem]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Kernel for ARM]

  Powered by Linux