2016-10-26 17:35 GMT+02:00 Alexandre Belloni
<alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Richard,
>
> On 26/10/2016 at 16:55:02 +0200, Richard Genoud wrote :
>> On 25/10/2016 19:17, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>> Quote from the commit message:
>> " Commit 1cf6e8fc8341 ("tty/serial: at91: fix RTS line management when
>> hardware handshake is enabled") actually allowed to enable hardware
>> handshaking.
>> Before, the CRTSCTS flags was silently ignored.
>> "
>> This wasn't true.
>> This was a misunderstanding of the ATMEL_US_USMODE_HWHS flag:
>> Commit 1cf6e8fc8341 didn't allowed to enable hardware handshaking, but
>> introduced the ATMEL_US_USMODE_HWHS flag.
>> And before 1cf6e8fc8341, the CRTSCTS flags wasn't silently ignored, it
>> was perfectly respected.
>>
>
> It was not really a misunderstanding, it is a difference in
> expectations. There is one topic on which we don't agree and I'm fine
> with your solution as long as I don't have to support people with the
> failures (hence my ack). My (and Cyrille's) opinion is that CRTSCTS has
> to be 100% reliable and this is only possible with assistance from the
> hardware. That's why I wanted to report when HW didn't have proper
> support to userspace.
> On your side you are fine with software handling of RTS and CTS (which
> is a feature that worked before our patches). You just have to remember
> that at some point because of latencies and the way the IPs are clocked,
> this will fail and you'll start losing bytes.
>
> Again, I'm fine with that but I won't handle people complaining about it
> :)
So you broke this on purpose ?
Without saying so in the commit message ?
Nice to know.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
