Re: [PATCH 3/5] serial-uartlite: Spinlock inside the loop.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 06:59:03PM +0100, Maarten Brock wrote:
> Better to hold the spinlock as short as possible.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maarten Brock <m.brock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/tty/serial/uartlite.c | 10 ++++------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/uartlite.c b/drivers/tty/serial/uartlite.c
> index f4ad0db..4fd81ad 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/uartlite.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/uartlite.c
> @@ -147,7 +147,6 @@ static int ulite_receive(struct uart_port *port, int stat)
>  	if (stat & ULITE_STATUS_PARITY)
>  		flag = TTY_PARITY;
>  
> -
>  	stat &= ~port->ignore_status_mask;
>  
>  	if (stat & ULITE_STATUS_RXVALID)

What was that change for?  I'll go delete it from this patch...

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux PPP]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linmodem]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Kernel for ARM]

  Powered by Linux