Hi Matthias, On 02/24/2016 09:22 PM, Matthias Brugger wrote: > > > On 24/02/16 18:10, Aleksey Makarov wrote: >> From: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> In order to support selecting earlycon via either ACPI or DT, move >> the decision on whether to attempt ACPI configuration into the >> early_param handling. Then make acpi_boot_table_init() bail out if >> acpi_disabled. >> >> Signed-off-by: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Aleksey Makarov <aleksey.makarov@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------- >> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c >> index d1ce8e2..3faa323 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c >> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c >> @@ -41,26 +41,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_disabled); >> int acpi_pci_disabled = 1; /* skip ACPI PCI scan and IRQ initialization */ >> EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_pci_disabled); >> >> -static bool param_acpi_off __initdata; >> static bool param_acpi_force __initdata; >> >> -static int __init parse_acpi(char *arg) >> -{ >> - if (!arg) >> - return -EINVAL; >> - >> - /* "acpi=off" disables both ACPI table parsing and interpreter */ >> - if (strcmp(arg, "off") == 0) >> - param_acpi_off = true; >> - else if (strcmp(arg, "force") == 0) /* force ACPI to be enabled */ >> - param_acpi_force = true; >> - else >> - return -EINVAL; /* Core will print when we return error */ >> - >> - return 0; >> -} >> -early_param("acpi", parse_acpi); >> - >> static int __init dt_scan_depth1_nodes(unsigned long node, >> const char *uname, int depth, >> void *data) >> @@ -74,6 +56,35 @@ static int __init dt_scan_depth1_nodes(unsigned long node, >> return 0; >> } >> >> +static int __init parse_acpi(char *arg) >> +{ >> + if (!arg) >> + return -EINVAL; >> + >> + /* >> + * Enable ACPI instead of device tree unless >> + * - ACPI has been disabled explicitly (acpi=off), or >> + * - the device tree is not empty (it has more than just a /chosen node) >> + * and ACPI has not been force enabled (acpi=force) >> + */ >> + if (strcmp(arg, "off") == 0) >> + return 0; >> + else if (strcmp(arg, "force") == 0) >> + param_acpi_force = true; >> + else if (of_scan_flat_dt(dt_scan_depth1_nodes, NULL)) > > I think we should strcmp for "on" here and return an error on other values. IMHO an update to Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt would be convenient. Actually this patch is not correct at all. on x86: - if default is off then "acpi=force" enables it. - if default is on then "acpi=off" disables it. on ARM64 by default OF is preferred to ACPI, but ACPI is used if OF does not provide any nontrivial data. So we need both "force" and "off" - "acpi=force" forces ACPI, - "acpi=off" disables ACPI The patch makes incorrect code transformation, it changes the default behaviour. This patch should just be dropped. The rest of the patchset does not depend on it. > I still wonder if we really want to change the default to ACPI disabled. > But that's a decision the maintainers have to take. I did not realize that the patch changes default. Thank you Aleksey Makarov > Regards, > Matthias > >> + return 0; >> + >> + /* >> + * ACPI is disabled at this point. Enable it in order to parse >> + * the ACPI tables and carry out sanity checks >> + */ >> + enable_acpi(); >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +early_param("acpi", parse_acpi); >> + >> /* >> * __acpi_map_table() will be called before page_init(), so early_ioremap() >> * or early_memremap() should be called here to for ACPI table mapping. >> @@ -181,23 +192,10 @@ out: >> */ >> void __init acpi_boot_table_init(void) >> { >> - /* >> - * Enable ACPI instead of device tree unless >> - * - ACPI has been disabled explicitly (acpi=off), or >> - * - the device tree is not empty (it has more than just a /chosen node) >> - * and ACPI has not been force enabled (acpi=force) >> - */ >> - if (param_acpi_off || >> - (!param_acpi_force && of_scan_flat_dt(dt_scan_depth1_nodes, NULL))) >> + if (acpi_disabled) >> return; >> >> /* >> - * ACPI is disabled at this point. Enable it in order to parse >> - * the ACPI tables and carry out sanity checks >> - */ >> - enable_acpi(); >> - >> - /* >> * If ACPI tables are initialized and FADT sanity checks passed, >> * leave ACPI enabled and carry on booting; otherwise disable ACPI >> * on initialization error. >> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html