On 21.02.2016 11:59, Anand Moon wrote: > Hi Krzysztof, > > On 21 February 2016 at 07:07, Krzysztof Kozlowski > <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> 2016-02-20 4:30 GMT+09:00 Peter Hurley <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >>> [ +cc Krzysztof Kozlowski ] >>> >>> On 02/18/2016 09:15 PM, Anand Moon wrote: >>>> From: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> >>>> drop the spin_unlock/lock around uart_write_wakeup to protect >>>> write wakeup for uart port. >>> >>> What Krzysztof was saying wrt v1 of this patch is that the >>> changelog should provide as much information as possible to >>> the maintainer(s) and driver author(s), and that you should >>> test that outcome. >>> >>> Here's what I would have written for a commit message: >>> >>> >>> Remove deadlock workaround for line disciplines that invoke >>> the tty driver's write() method directly from their write_wakeup() >>> method. As documented for the write_wakeup() line discipline method >>> in tty_ldisc.h, line disciplines must not attempt i/o directly >>> from write_wakeup() as this will deadlock. Reviews of in-tree line >>> disciplines confirm all defer i/o. >>> >>> NB: This workaround was added in commit c15c3747ee32 >>> ("serial: samsung: fix potential soft lockup during uart write") >>> which notes both slip and bluetooth hci attempt i/o directly from >>> write_wakeup(). These issues were fixed in commits 661f7fda21b1 >>> ("slip: Fix deadlock in write_wakeup") and da64c27d3c93 >>> ("bluetooth: hci_ldisc: fix deadlock condition"), respectively. >> >> Thanks Peter for thorough analysis. It shouldn't be done by you but by >> the patch submitter... and I have big worries that Anand did not >> perform that analysis. >> >> Anand, could you at least test that this lockup does not happen >> anymore? You will need board with Bluetooth for that (and not USB >> Bluetooth...). If you cannot test it, maybe guys from Polish R&D could >> help you (Cc-ed), because they were working on DMA for serial used in >> Bluetooth. >> >> Best regards, >> Krzysztof > > I have looked into the history of the changes, > commit c15c3747ee32 (serial: samsung: fix potential soft lockup during > uart write) > was added long time ago, that's why have missed this. > > I don't have on-board Bluetooth enable boards with me, > so if their is potential lockup you people observer > do not consider this patch. Which means that you cannot test it... Find someone who can test it with Bluetooth (or SLIP) and will provide you a Tested-by tag. Best regards, Krzysztof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html