Re: 8250_fintek aliasing PNP0501

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ping?

I'd hate to have to remove the driver instead.

Regards,
Peter Hurley

On 12/01/2015 04:56 PM, Peter Hurley wrote:
> Hi Ricardo,
> 
> There are some problems with the 8250_fintek driver.
> 
> Advertising as the PNP0501 driver but also having a module
> dependency on the 8250 driver (which is also advertising as
> the PNP0501 driver) is not a stable configuration.
> 
> The problem is that the 8250 driver will probe first (because
> of the module dependency) and claim the pnp resource so the
> the 8250_fintek driver never probes.
> 
> But it stays loaded; so if it is unloaded, it drops the
> module reference and causes the 8250 driver to also unload.
> 
> The other problem is the *blind writing to port i/o addresses*
> during the probe to id the Fintek part. This is not safe and
> not ok. Some other mechanism for id'ing the part is required.
> Is there some non-destructive method of id'ing the Fintek
> part?
> 
> Regards,
> Peter Hurley
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux PPP]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linmodem]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Kernel for ARM]

  Powered by Linux