On 11/09/2015 10:45 AM, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:
> 2015-11-09 17:40 GMT+03:00 Peter Hurley <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> On 11/08/2015 05:52 AM, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:
>>> 2015-11-07 19:03 GMT+03:00 Peter Hurley <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>>> On 11/07/2015 05:09 AM, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:
[...]
>>>>> +static void serial8250_rs485_start_tx(struct uart_8250_port *p)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + if (p->capabilities & UART_CAP_HW485 || !(p->port.rs485.flags & SER_RS485_ENABLED))
>>>>> + return;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (p->port.rs485.flags & SER_RS485_RTS_ON_SEND) {
>>>>> + serial_port_out(&p->port, UART_MCR, UART_MCR_RTS);
>>>>> + if (p->port.rs485.delay_rts_before_send > 0)
>>>>> + mdelay(p->port.rs485.delay_rts_before_send);
>>>>
>>>> So irqs are off for x msecs, and this cpu can't be used for anything else now?
>>>> I think this needs to be solved differently; maybe with a timer?
>>>
>>> Call of serial8250_start_tx is wrapped with spin_lock_irq in serial_core.c:2154
>>
>> Yep, which is why I pointed out "irqs are off for x msecs".
>>
>>> I've tried to use msleep instead of mdelay but got "BUG: scheduling
>>> while atomic".
>>
>> Right, can't sleep while irqs are off, which is why I suggested something
>> like a timer.
>
> I am not sure that understand you correctly. Do you think that the
> following would be ok?
>
> wait_queue_head_t wait;
> init_waitqueue_head(&wait);
> wait_event_timeout(wait, 0, p->port.rs485.delay_rts_before_send * HZ / 1000);
Except for spinning, there is no way to wait-in-place with irqs off.
You'll need to do something more complex, like
1. raise RTS
2. start a timer _and return early without starting tx_
3. timer goes off, handler actually starts tx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
