Hi Peter, 2015-10-22 0:35 GMT+09:00 Peter Hurley <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > Hi Masahiro, > > On 10/21/2015 11:31 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote: >> If it is always correct to preserve the initialization done by boot-loader, >> the following code in 8250_early.c does not make sense. > > It's not always correct to preserve the initialization by the bootloader. > For example, on my legacy x86 workstation, the bootloader does not > initialize the h/w so when I want 8250 earlycon, I must specify the > baud rate. So, the input clock on the machine matches the following macro. #define BASE_BAUD (1843200/16) For ARM boards, we should depend on a boot loader. Is this what you mean? -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
