On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 06:22:26PM +0000, Dave Martin wrote: > Thanks to Jakub Kiciński for his bug report and discussion, and for > showing out how we can manage without the softirq (and providing a > patch, though merging my rework with it got difficult, so I don't > include it in the series now). > > > There are two alternate versions of the series threaded from this cover > letter: > > * [PATCH v3] - patch against v4.0-rc5 that supersedes the previous > series; this is the less churny option. > > * [PATCH v3, tty-next..] - patches against tty-next that > modify/partially revert the previous series without needing a > rebase. > > Take your pick. I have no idea what you want me to do here, sorry. I need to apply patches to tty-next, I can't do anything against a "clean" 4.0-rc5 as your patches are already in tty-next. And I can't tell the two series apart here... Can you just resend what you want me to apply to tty-next and we can go from there? confused, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
