Re: [PATCH V5.1] serial/uart/8250: Add tunable RX interrupt trigger I/F of FIFO buffers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/15/2014 02:06 AM, Yoshihiro YUNOMAE wrote:
> /* I found a bug in V5, so I resend this as V5.1. Please do not review V5. */
> 
> Add tunable RX interrupt trigger I/F of FIFO buffers.
> Serial devices are used as not only message communication devices but control
> or sending communication devices. For the latter uses, normally small data
> will be exchanged, so user applications want to receive data unit as soon as
> possible for real-time tendency. If we have a sensor which sends a 1 byte data
> each time and must control a device based on the sensor feedback, the RX
> interrupt should be triggered for each data.
> 
> According to HW specification of serial UART devices, RX interrupt trigger
> can be changed, but the trigger is hard-coded. For example, RX interrupt trigger
> in 16550A can be set to 1, 4, 8, or 14 bytes for HW, but current driver sets
> the trigger to only 8bytes.

> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250.h b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250.h

> +#define FCR_RX_TRIG_OFFSET	6

Isn't "SHIFT" the usual term rather than "OFFSET". Why not add this
define into include/uapi/linux/serial_reg.h, along with all the other
UART_FCR_TRIGGER_* defines?

> +#define FCR_RX_TRIG_BITS(x)	(((x) >> FCR_RX_TRIG_OFFSET) & 0x3)

Perhaps use UART_FCR_TRIGGER_MASK rather than a hard-coded "3" (and then
you'd have to mask before shifting).

> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_core.c b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_core.c

> @@ -2275,10 +2276,9 @@ serial8250_do_set_termios(struct uart_port *port, struct ktermios *termios,

>  	if (up->capabilities & UART_CAP_FIFO && port->fifosize > 1) {
> -		fcr = uart_config[port->type].fcr;
> -		if ((baud < 2400 && !up->dma) || fifo_bug) {
> -			fcr &= ~UART_FCR_TRIGGER_MASK;
> -			fcr |= UART_FCR_TRIGGER_1;
> +		/* NOTE: If fifo_bug is not set, a uaser can set RX_trigger. */
> +		if ((baud < 2400 && !up->dma &&
> +		    (up->fcr == uart_config[port->type].fcr)) || up->fifo_bug) {
> +			up->fcr &= ~UART_FCR_TRIGGER_MASK;
> +			up->fcr |= UART_FCR_TRIGGER_1;
>  		}
>  	}

Does the "(up->fcr == uart_config[port->type].fcr)" term prevent the
user from changing the trigger level multiple times? Perhaps this is
intended?

> +static int convert_fcr2val(struct uart_8250_port *up)

"val" is rather generic here, and doesn't describe what the function is
doing. What about fcr_get_rxtrig_bytes()?

> +{
> +	const struct serial8250_config *conf_type = &uart_config[up->port.type];
> +	unsigned char rx_trig_raw = up->fcr & UART_FCR_TRIGGER_MASK;
> +	unsigned char val;
> +
> +	val = conf_type->rx_trig_byte[FCR_RX_TRIG_BITS(rx_trig_raw)];

Given that FCR_RX_TRIG_BITS() does all the required shifting/masking,
why not just:

	val = conf_type->rx_trig_byte[FCR_RX_TRIG_BITS(up->fcr)];

> +static int convert_val2rxtrig(struct uart_8250_port *up, unsigned char val)

Perhaps name this bytes_to_fcr_txtrig()?

> +static void register_dev_spec_attr_grp(struct uart_8250_port *up)
> +{
> +	switch (up->port.type) {
> +	case PORT_16550A:
> +	case PORT_16650V2:
> +	case PORT_16654:
> +	case PORT_16750:
> +	case PORT_TEGRA:

Why not replace that with:

const struct serial8250_config *conf_type = &uart_config[up->port.type];
if (conf_type->rx_trig_byte[0]) {

(or something like that anyway)

That means this switch statement doesn't need to be updated when new
UART types are modified to set up the rx_trig_byte field.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux PPP]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linmodem]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Kernel for ARM]

  Powered by Linux