On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 20:12 -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 04:10:33PM +0200, Heikki Krogerus wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 02:26:45PM +0400, Sergei Ianovich wrote: > > > Who makes the decision which way to go? > > > > Greg and Russel make this decision. By having the pxa driver simply > > register 8250 ports would probable reduce the code. Thats about the > > biggest benefit from it. > > > > It would still be something nice to have IMO. Ideally all the > > 8250/16x50 UARTs should register the ports with 8250_core.c, and not > > create complete uart driver on their own. > > I agree, this is the best way to resolve this, having a separate uart > driver isn't that good at all to be doing, if at all possible. I'm reading the last message as a confirmation that drivers/tty/serial/pxa.c needs to be rewritten using 8250_core.c. However, "if at all possible" confuses me, since we have pxa.c in the tree and it works. Greg, could you please clarify? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
