Hello Greg, On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 09:09:11AM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 11:23:53AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > Hello Greg, hi Nicolas, > > > > On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 09:47:50AM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > > > On 13/11/2013 17:28, Nicolas Ferre : > > > >On 07/11/2013 10:25, Linus Walleij : > > > >>This passes the errata fix using a GPIO to control the RTS pin > > > >>on one of the AT91 chips to use gpiolib instead of the > > > >>AT91-specific interfaces. Also remove the reliance on > > > >>compile-time #defines and the cpu_* check and rely on the > > > >>platform passing down the proper GPIO pin through platform > > > >>data. > > > >> > > > >>This is a prerequisite for getting rid of the local GPIO > > > >>implementation in the AT91 platform and move toward > > > >>multiplatform. > > > >> > > > >>The patch also adds device tree support for getting the > > > >>RTS GPIO pin from the device tree on DT boot paths. > > > >> > > > >>Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxx> > > > >>Acked-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > >>Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > >Hi Greg, > > > > > > > >You acknowledged a previous version of this patch which was taking a > > > >different approach with the subject: > > > >"[PATCH 1/4] ARM/serial: at91: move machine quirk into machine" > > > > > > > >In order to integrate the series build by Linus in our AT91/arm-soc > > > >flow, would you mind reviewing this v4 patch and eventually giving your > > > >blessing ;-) > > > >If it is okay on your side, I'll integrate it in a pull-request to > > > >arm-soc for 3.14. > > > > > > Greg, ping? > > I'm depending on that patch for a series that gets rid of ARM's > > <mach/timex.h>. So I'm interested to either get a stable commit to > > base on or alternatively to get the blessing from both of you to take it > > (also via arm-soc) as part of my series. > > > > A preview of my series is available at > > > > git://git.pengutronix.de/git/ukl/linux.git deprecatemachtimexh > > No objection from me to take it through your tree. gregkh: Thanks. I'll interpret this as Acked-by: you if Nicolas also agrees that I take it. nferre: What is your plan with this patch? Do you have patches depending on it, too, or is it ok if I take it? Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
