Re: [PATCH tty-next 5/7] n_tty: Refactor input_available_p() by call site

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 23 Nov 2013 21:01:56 -0500
Peter Hurley <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 11/23/2013 07:26 PM, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
> > On Fri, 22 Nov 2013 10:59:23 -0500
> > Peter Hurley <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> Distinguish if caller is n_tty_poll() or n_tty_read(), and
> >> set the read/wakeup threshold accordingly.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Peter Hurley <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Doh ignore previous.. yes that patch is right.  I should pay attention to
> > 0/7 8)
> 
> Maybe I should add more to the commit message from the cover letter
> description ?

Maybe I should just read the code more carefully 8).

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux PPP]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linmodem]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Kernel for ARM]

  Powered by Linux