On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 12:21:49AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 09:03:06AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > Hello Kees, hello Greg, > > > > since commit > > 7d12b97 (serial: report base_baud after initialization) > > my efm32 machine says during startup: > > 4000e400.uart: ttyefm4 at MMIO 0x4000e400 (irq = 25, base_baud = 0) is a efm32-uart > > > > Is this "= 0" expected or is there something wrong in the driver? > > Does the hardware work properly? That's the best test of this, right? Yes, it works fine. Still I wonder if there is a problem that the driver doesn't fill in port.uartclk early enough. In the efm32-uart driver (i.e. drivers/tty/serial/efm32-uart.c) this member is only assigned to in .startup. Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
