Hello,
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 04:41:25PM +0800, Huang Shijie wrote:
> 于 2013年07月15日 16:27, Uwe Kleine-König 写道:
> >do you want to say that the driver fails to only enable DMA when RTS/CTS
> >are available; or that today the driver can handle DMA just fine even
> >without RTS/CTS? I interpret your commit log as the latter, your patch
> >implements the former however.
> in the mxs-auart, if the RTS/CTS is not invalid, the DMA should be
> not enabled.
>
> But current code lost the limit, a uart without the RTS/CTS may also
> enables the DMA in which case the uart
> may does not run or run in a abnormal way.
So this sounds like a fix that should go into stable and so preferably
should be the first patch in your series.
Something like:
serial: mxs-auart: DMA unreliable without RTS/CTS
According to [add some document name here] DMA doesn't work
reliable without hardware handshaking. So make DMA dependant on
a newly introdused property "fsl,uart-has-rtscts".
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxx # [first affected version]
The flag is only used to decide if dma should be enabled. So I think an
in-code comment would be nice, too. Is it still correct to set
AUART_CTRL2_RTSEN and AUART_CTRL2_RTS and read AUART_STAT_CTS when
fsl,uart-has-rtscts is not provided?
(BTW, mxs_auart_set_mctrl has:
u32 ctrl = readl(u->membase + AUART_CTRL2);
ctrl &= ~(AUART_CTRL2_RTSEN | AUART_CTRL2_RTS);
if (mctrl & TIOCM_RTS) {
if (tty_port_cts_enabled(&u->state->port))
ctrl |= AUART_CTRL2_RTSEN;
else
ctrl |= AUART_CTRL2_RTS;
}
s->ctrl = mctrl;
A comment for the diligent reader about the difference between RTSEN and
RTS would be nice. Also I wonder if shadowing mctrl is sensible and used
correctly here.)
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
