Re: [PATCH] serial/8250: Add support for Exar's XR17V35x family of multi-port PCIe UARTs.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 11:52:32 -0600
> Matt Schulte <matts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> @@ -1484,6 +1526,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(serial8250_modem_status);
>> >>  int serial8250_handle_irq(struct uart_port *port, unsigned int iir)
>> >>  {
>> >>       unsigned char status;
>> >> +     unsigned char int0, int1, int2, int3;
>> >>       unsigned long flags;
>> >>       struct uart_8250_port *up =
>> >>               container_of(port, struct uart_8250_port, port);
>> >> @@ -1503,6 +1546,19 @@ int serial8250_handle_irq(struct uart_port
>> >> *port, unsigned int iir)
>> >>       if (status & UART_LSR_THRE)
>> >>               serial8250_tx_chars(up);
>> >>
>> >> +     /*
>> >> +      * These Exar UARTs have an extra interrupt indicator that could
>> >> +      * fire for a few unimplemented interrupts.  Put this here just
>> >> +      * to be on the safe side that these interrupts don't go unhandled.
>> >> +      */
>> >> +
>> >> +     if (up->port.type == PORT_XR17V35X && status == 0) {
>> >> +             int0 = serial_port_in(port, 0x80);
>> >> +             int1 = serial_port_in(port, 0x81);
>> >> +             int2 = serial_port_in(port, 0x82);
>> >> +             int3 = serial_port_in(port, 0x83);
>> >> +     }
>> >> +
>> >>       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&port->lock, flags);
>> >>       return 1;
>> >
>> > Provide your own handle_irq method rather than adding more special cases
>> > to the default one (you can just wrap the default one and then perform
>> > the extra actions). Just a case of trying to keep the fast paths clean and
>> > maintainable.
>> >
>> > Otherwise looks good.
>> >
>> > Alan
>>
>> Thanks Alan, would the new Exar_handle_irq method be allowed to be
>> inside 8250.c?
>
> If its probed generically then it probably should - we can move it later
> anyway
>

I'm having trouble figuring out where would be the right place to override the

     uart_port.handle_irq = serial8250_default_handle_irq

with my

     uart_port.handle_irq = exar_handle_irq

Can you give me a tip as to where in 8250.c this should be done?

Thank you,
Matt Schulte
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux PPP]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linmodem]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Kernel for ARM]

  Powered by Linux