On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 11:31:41AM -0500, Matt Schulte wrote: > On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Matt Schulte > <matts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Alan's advice to get your card working as a basic serial card is very > >> good one. Get basic functionality working, and then you can add the > >> support for the extra bits later.... > > > > I can see the logic in getting it working as a basic serial card > > first. I think at minimum I would still need to implement the extra > > divisor calculations to get accurate bit rates. > > > > So when it works as a basic serial card, I assume you would want me to > > use the default PCI IDs to keep it more generic. Then would I add my > > own PCI IDs and refer them back to the generic port? > > > > As more of a procedural question, when I go to make the patch(es) to > submit which, kernel repo do I start with? Do I start with Greg KH's > tty repo and then generate the patches and submit them here? That would be a great place to work off of, use the tty-next branch please. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
