On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 07:43:11AM -0500, Jason Wessel wrote: > On 09/17/2012 06:37 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 08:01:33AM -0700, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> Here comes the lucky v7: > >> > >> - Per Alan Cox's suggestion added hangup method and removed a small > >> leftover; > >> - Per Colin Cross' suggestion moved IRQ quiescing logic into > >> poll_get_char routine. IIUC, Alan is less unhappy about it. As a > >> result, clear_irq() callback dropped. > >> > >> These patches can be found in the following repo (based on tty-next): > >> > >> git://git.infradead.org/users/cbou/linux-nmi-kdb.git master > >> > >> Old changelogs and rationale for these patches can be found here: > >> > >> v1-v5, rationale: http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/10/2 > >> v6: http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/10/2 > > I have no objection to these patches, and as they are based on my > > tty-next tree, should I be the ones accepting them? If so, then I need > > a bunch of acks from others involved in the kdb/kgdb code before I can > > do so. > > > > To make it easier, can I just take the tty driver patches now? Will > > that break anything? > > I have not made my way through the entire series yet, so I am not sure > if you need the kdb header changes or not, but so far it looks like > the tty pieces are separate. If you add your ack Greg, I'll take the > whole series and merge it into kgdb-next, or after I finish the review > we could do it the other way around. Your tree is fine: Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Let me know if you have problems merging this due to any tty patches, and if so, I'll be glad to take them through my tree. greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
