On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:16:24PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > serial port, the CPU receives NMI exception, and we fall into KDB > > shell. So, it is our "debug console", and it is able to interrupt > > (and thus debug) even IRQ handlers themselves. > > You seem to have an assumption of single core here. What happens if > the NMI hits CPU #0 and the serial IRQ hits CPU #1 simultaneously ? If you can't redirect all serial IRQs to NMI context, e.g. sometimes you get NMIs, sometimes IRQs, then your NMI handling is not deterministic, and surely this is not supported. The whole concept of clearing IRQs is needed if serial IRQ is routed to the NMI/FIQ (on all CPUs), which by definition guarantees that serial IRQ routine is never triggered. We "steal" all and every serial port's IRQs. Thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html