On Thu, 6 Sep 2012 23:20:32 +0100
Sean Young <sean@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> These ports should not be probed, but we need to keep track of them so we
> can prevent the legacy (non-PNP) probe of serial ports from touching them
> too.
I want to have a think about getting the ordering right so we don't
shuffle the ports on existing boxes for the first half. For the second
part
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Young <sean@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
> drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_pnp.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++-----
> include/linux/serial_core.h | 3 ++-
> 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250.c b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250.c
> index bc25874..ea9166b 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250.c
> @@ -290,6 +290,9 @@ static const struct serial8250_config uart_config[] = {
> UART_FCR_R_TRIG_00 | UART_FCR_T_TRIG_00,
> .flags = UART_CAP_FIFO,
> },
> + [PORT_IR] = {
> + .name = "IR port"
Please use "CIR port". We have SIR and FIR serial ports (IrDA) too that we
do drive via tty. PORT_8250_CIR for the type might be best too - it means
the tools know what they are looking at and can report it sensibly.
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
