Re: [PATCH v3 20/23] serial: omap: fix software flow control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 01:27:49PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 01:33:00PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > From: Vikram Pandita <vikram.pandita@xxxxxx>
> > 
> > Software flow control register bits were not defined correctly.
> > 
> > Also clarify the IXON and IXOFF logic to reflect what userspace wants.
> > 
> > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Tested-by: Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti@xxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Vikram Pandita <vikram.pandita@xxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti@xxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx>
> > Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> 
> If this is a stable patch, should it be pulled out and put also in for
> 3.6?

I'll leave that for Vikram to answer. Vikram, do you think this is
something so extreme that we _must_ apply it now, or can it wait for the
next merge window ?

I mean, I think this bug has been in the driver for a long time, right ?

-- 
balbi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux PPP]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linmodem]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Kernel for ARM]

  Powered by Linux