On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 09:29:11PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 13:09:50 -0700 > Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 03:33:13PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > > From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > The old interface just copies bits over and calls the newer one. > > > In addition we can now pass more information. > > > > > > Updated to fix the cases reported by Stephen Rothwell and those found > > > by Fegguang's nifty new 0 day build tester. In particular it now builds > > > correctly for openfirmware and for OLPC. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > I already applied an older version of this, so it doesn't apply > > properly. > > > > can you redo this patch series based on my tty-next branch now, and > > resend these last 6 patches, if they are still needed? > > I can do but that will simply be a series of reverts of the old stuff > followed by the patches I sent... we need to rewind to before the lock > change patch or it all ends up impossible to bisect. Ok, that's fine with me. greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
