On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 01:16:34PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote: >> From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx> >> Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 15:06:24 -0700 >> Subject: [PATCH v2] serial/8250_pci: add a quirk for the kt serial controller >> >> Workaround dropped notifications in the iir register. Prevent reads >> coincident with new interrupt notifications by reading the iir at most >> once per interrupt. >> >> Reported-by: Nhan H Mai <nhan.h.mai@xxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx> > > Much better. > > But. > > Do you really think I can apply a patch that looks like this above? I > have to edit the text of the email before I apply it. I don't doubt you get busted patches all the time, this isn't one. Double checked before and now triple checked that git am takes the last occurrence of the From: Date: and Subject: headers and that my mailer is not corrupting the patch. I have no problem resending to fit into your workflow, but I expect "git am" will do the right thing with this mail. -- Dan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
