On 09/24/2011 12:04 AM, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 09:21:20PM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote: >> But if there are more trees depending on the tree, then OK, I will live >> with that ;). > > For the tty tree, I really doubt it, but I am not sure (rumor has it > that some people are basing on it, but that might just be rumor.) Ok, for the other uart patches I have, it would be convenient for me to have the possibility of rebase. Would you mind if I add something like uart-cleanup tree to the -next tree and will have the patches there until I send them to you? Just for the purpose of fine tuning (and rebasing) if something needs to be fixed in them. The code is so complex, that I'm afraid I omitted some semi-hidden dependency. And it would be great to fix patches like when I used to work with the -mm tree. thanks, -- js -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
