Re: [PATCH] serial: SERIAL_MRST_MAX3110 should depend on X86_MRST

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 22:40:16 +0200
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> As I understand it, driver mrst_max3110 is only useful on Moorestown
> systems, so it should depend on X86_MRST.

Not so simple. There are various things that need dependancies. Some I've
sorted in my tree, some not, but it's all shelved until kernel.org is
back as I've switched to working on other projects for the moment rather
than waste time chasing trees around the internet.

> Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> There are a few other drivers in a similar situation
> (i2c/busses/i2c-intel-mid, gpio/langwell_gpio, tty/serial/mfd,
> staging/sep) for which I suspect the same should be done,
> assuming that X86_MRST is for both Moorestown and Medfield.

Not with the latest patches.

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux PPP]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linmodem]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Kernel for ARM]

  Powered by Linux