On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 6:23 AM, Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I don't agree with this change. NO_IRQ for microblaze, arm and other is -1. BTW: >> For ppc is 0. Using NO_IRQ seems to me reasonable. > > 0 means "no interrupt". > > The old mis-use of -1 is an old mostly ARM specific ugly that ahould be > going away not getting repeated further. If Microblaze is using this hack > then it needs to stop. This will be easier for microblaze when I finish the irq_domain work. There are patches on the list, but they need to be reworked before they are ready for mainline consumption. g. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
