> I thought I was improving but now as I look at it further, that seems like it > was better and I should have stuck to that method. > > Thoughts? Go for nearest is the right behaviour. The whole tty layer works on that basis as do soem other things. It means you don't have to have a set of calls to do things like "enumerate valid data rates" instead you ask and compare. > > > + uart_update_timeout(port, termios->c_cflag, baud); > > > > [which would also fix this timeout!] > > Maybe you were meaning that if the baud rate was not really set because of the > error this timeout would be wrong also, and if so that makes sense. Correct Alan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
