On 2011-04-06, Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I could tell them to go the SPD_CUST route to get 921600, but I was
>> hoping to provide an option that would support 921600 the same way
>> that 57600, 230400, and 460800 are supported.
>
> And no doubt in time other speeds as well.
>
> ASYNC_SPD_xxx is legacy, it remains simply because we provided it as a
> historic interface to some drivers and we don't want to break stuff
>
> So please use SPD_CUST if you must do this.
I don't understand: what's the non-legacy alternative to using SPD_CUST?
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! I'm having a
at tax-deductible experience!
gmail.com I need an energy crunch!!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
