On Mon, 04 Oct 2010 15:59:29 -0700 Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 15:21 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Mon, 04 Oct 2010 15:10:59 -0700 > > Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 15:02 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > On Mon, 4 Oct 2010 14:51:01 -0700 > > > > Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > I'll give up and pronounce that users of printk_ratelimited() need to > > > > include ratelimit.h as well. > > > What I suggested several months ago was to move the > > > macro definitions to ratelimit.h > > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/2/18/377 > > That's a bit nasty because at present ratelimit.h is purely about > > ratelimiting and knowns nothing about any of its clients. At present > > it has only one client (printk), but it could have more in the future! > > Look at the structure, it's very specific to > message logging functionality. > > struct ratelimit_state { > spinlock_t lock; /* protect the state */ > > int interval; > int burst; > int printed; > int missed; > unsigned long begin; > }; s/printed/hit/there,fixed This is at present a quite general facility. > I think it's likely that the current ratelimit > will not be used for any other function. Filling it up with printk-specific stuff will help ensure that. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
