Re: [RFC] suggested fix for 83xx/85xx PowerPC UART break bug

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Jul 31, 2008, at 10:26 AM, Paul Gortmaker wrote:


This is something I'd tripped over earlier, and wanted to follow up on
to get an acceptable fix in for everyone's benefit before it falls through
the cracks again.

There seems to be an issue with recent 83xx/85xx SOC UARTs, in which a break triggers a short lived IRQ storm (hence killing any hope of using SysRQ).
The only fix I found to work was to just ignore the bogus events that
had the associated signature bit set.

This fix is what I was using against earlier kernels, but I hate to add more
board/arch specific ifdefs to files like 8250.c, so I'm wondering if
anyone has any other suggestions before I simply end up cleaning up the
boardlist (now ppc is dead) and respinning the patch much as it is now
and resending.

How did you test this or generate it? I was thinking about this the other day and figured we need to try and track this down with the HW guys. If we can generate a simple test I can try and run it through the various boards/parts we have and see which ones show the issue and which dont.

- k
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux PPP]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linmodem]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Kernel for ARM]

  Powered by Linux