Re: [PATCH 2/2] [POWERPC] UCC nodes cleanup

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Apr 14, 2008, at 9:56 AM, Timur Tabi wrote:
Kumar Gala wrote:

I say leave as you have it (UCC1 == cell-index = <1>).

Changing it so cell-index = <0> is just more confusing w/regards to
the docs.

I don't see anything in booting-without-of.txt that requires cell- index to start at 0, however, the only other device that starts at 1 is SATA. Even the SSI
starts at 0:

      - cell-index	  : the SSI, <0> = SSI1, <1> = SSI2, and so on

Although I don't want to make more work for Anton, my vote is to have cell-index start at 0. That is the convention. It's too late to fix SATA, but at least we
can avoid making it worse.

I use cell-index starting at 1 for PCI to match our docs.

I'll take Anton's last patch.

- k
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux PPP]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linmodem]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Kernel for ARM]

  Powered by Linux