Correct spelling in pkt_cls.h and red.h.
As reported by codespell.
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/net/pkt_cls.h | 2 +-
include/net/red.h | 8 ++++----
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/pkt_cls.h b/include/net/pkt_cls.h
index 41297bd38dff..4880b3a7aced 100644
--- a/include/net/pkt_cls.h
+++ b/include/net/pkt_cls.h
@@ -491,7 +491,7 @@ int __tcf_em_tree_match(struct sk_buff *, struct tcf_ematch_tree *,
struct tcf_pkt_info *);
/**
- * tcf_em_tree_match - evaulate an ematch tree
+ * tcf_em_tree_match - evaluate an ematch tree
*
* @skb: socket buffer of the packet in question
* @tree: ematch tree to be used for evaluation
diff --git a/include/net/red.h b/include/net/red.h
index 802287d52c9e..159a09359fc0 100644
--- a/include/net/red.h
+++ b/include/net/red.h
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@
max_P should be small (not 1), usually 0.01..0.02 is good value.
max_P is chosen as a number, so that max_P/(th_max-th_min)
- is a negative power of two in order arithmetics to contain
+ is a negative power of two in order arithmetic to contain
only shifts.
@@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ static inline u32 red_maxp(u8 Plog)
static inline void red_set_vars(struct red_vars *v)
{
/* Reset average queue length, the value is strictly bound
- * to the parameters below, reseting hurts a bit but leaving
+ * to the parameters below, resetting hurts a bit but leaving
* it might result in an unreasonable qavg for a while. --TGR
*/
v->qavg = 0;
@@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ static inline unsigned long red_calc_qavg_no_idle_time(const struct red_parms *p
{
/*
* NOTE: v->qavg is fixed point number with point at Wlog.
- * The formula below is equvalent to floating point
+ * The formula below is equivalent to floating point
* version:
*
* qavg = qavg*(1-W) + backlog*W;
@@ -375,7 +375,7 @@ static inline int red_mark_probability(const struct red_parms *p,
OK. qR is random number in the interval
(0..1/max_P)*(qth_max-qth_min)
i.e. 0..(2^Plog). If we used floating point
- arithmetics, it would be: (2^Plog)*rnd_num,
+ arithmetic, it would be: (2^Plog)*rnd_num,
where rnd_num is less 1.
Taking into account, that qavg have fixed
--
2.43.0
