On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 9:53 AM Guillaume Nault <gnault@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> There's no reason for setting the RTO_ONLINK flag in ->flowi4_tos as
> RT_CONN_FLAGS() does. We can easily set ->flowi4_scope properly
> instead. This makes the code more explicit and will allow to convert
> ->flowi4_tos to dscp_t in the future.
>
> Signed-off-by: Guillaume Nault <gnault@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> net/sctp/protocol.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sctp/protocol.c b/net/sctp/protocol.c
> index 274d07bd774f..33c0895e101c 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/protocol.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/protocol.c
> @@ -435,7 +435,8 @@ static void sctp_v4_get_dst(struct sctp_transport *t, union sctp_addr *saddr,
> fl4->fl4_dport = daddr->v4.sin_port;
> fl4->flowi4_proto = IPPROTO_SCTP;
> if (asoc) {
> - fl4->flowi4_tos = RT_CONN_FLAGS_TOS(asoc->base.sk, tos);
> + fl4->flowi4_tos = RT_TOS(tos);
> + fl4->flowi4_scope = ip_sock_rt_scope(asoc->base.sk);
> fl4->flowi4_oif = asoc->base.sk->sk_bound_dev_if;
> fl4->fl4_sport = htons(asoc->base.bind_addr.port);
> }
> --
> 2.39.2
Reviewed-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@xxxxxxxxx>
