From: Willem de Bruijn
> Sent: 19 May 2023 18:05
...
> > Should I stack allocate all the 4 structures sock_skprot_ioctl and pass
> > them to sock_skproto_ioctl_inout() together with the size? (using the
> > original name to avoid confusion - will rename in V2)
> >
> > I mean, writing something as:
> >
> > int sock_skprot_ioctl(struct sock *sk, unsigned int cmd
> > void __user *arg`
> > {
> > struct sioc_vif_req sioc_vif_req_arg;
> > struct sioc_sg_req sioc_sg_req_arg;
> > struct sioc_mif_req6 sioc_mif_req6_arg;
> > struct sioc_sg_req6 sioc_sg_req6_arg;
> >
> > ..
> >
> > if (!strcmp(sk->sk_prot->name, "RAW6")) {
> > switch (cmd) {
> > case SIOCGETMIFCNT_IN6:
> > return sock_skproto_ioctl_inout(sk, cmd,
> > arg, &sioc_mif_req6_arg, sizeof(sioc_mif_req6_arg);
> > case SIOCGETSGCNT_IN6:
> > return sock_skproto_ioctl_inout(sk, cmd,
> > arg, &sioc_sg_req6_arg, sizeof(sioc_sg_req6_arg));
> > }
> > }
> > ...
> > }
>
> Slight preference for using braces in the individual case statements
> and defining the variables in that block scope. See for instance
> do_tcp_setsockopt.
Beware of stack bloat especially under KASAN (etc).
It might be better to use a union.
Then the switch statement only need determine the required length.
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
