Re: sctp discarding received data chunks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Can you see this issue with the 5.4 kernel too?

I did yesterday some testing by upgrading kernel from 5.4 to 5.7 and I run into all sorts of links going off after a while so I had to revert back.
5.4 is stable for me. 5.7 is not. And I have lots of M2PA and M3UA connections like you

> On 8 Oct 2020, at 23:46, David Laight <David.Laight@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> One of my local tests (that I run quite often) failed in a 'new and exciting way'.
> I sent 510 messages through an M3UA-MTP2-M3UA link and only got ~350 at the far end.
> (This is part of my SS7+TCAP regression test - gets run a lot.)
> Usually I can find 'lost' messages logged as discarded due to my own flow control.
> In this case there is no sign of any error traces.
> I expect to have each message traced 6 times (on each send and receive)
> but the missing messages are only traced 5 times.
> 
> Now /proc/net/sctp/snmp has SctpInDataChunksDiscards set to 163,
> this matches the number of messages I'm missing.
> Any idea how I can find out why one (or more) the SCTP connections (which are still
> connected - unless there is a power cut) has discarded a lot of receive packets?
> 
> Each M3UA link is actually 4 SCTP connections (TCP style 1-1).
> All are loopback connected to 127.0.0.1 or ::1 (the assocs print is 'interesting').
> The local port is 'random' the listening port 2905 or 2906.
> I'd expect the data to loadshare evenly between them but I've not checked the actual
> distribution.
> The packet data contains a sequence number, I'm missing all the x1, x2, x9, xa
> and half the x6 and xe packets - so I think at least one of the sctp connections
> is just discarding the receive chunks.
> (I'll sort out which one tomorrow.)
> 
> This is a 5.6.0-rc7 kernel.
> I've not seen anything like this before - I've run this same test for
> over 10 years, probably going back to at least 2.6.28.
> 
> Data chunks will have gone though all the connections when they were
> initialised.
> 
> Is there anything anywhere that indicates why a data chunk was dropped?
> 
> 	David
> 
> -
> Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
> Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
> 





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux