On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 06:09:49PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 14:57:15 +0800
>
> > As it says in rfc6458#section-9.2:
> >
> > The application uses the sctp_peeloff() call to branch off an
> > association into a separate socket. (Note that the semantics are
> > somewhat changed from the traditional one-to-one style accept()
> > call.) Note also that the new socket is a one-to-one style socket.
> > Thus, it will be confined to operations allowed for a one-to-one
> > style socket.
> >
> > Prior to this patch, sctp_peeloff() returned a one-to-many type socket,
> > on which some operations are not allowed, like shutdown, as Jere
> > reported.
> >
> > This patch is to change it to return a one-to-one type socket instead.
> >
> > Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
> > Reported-by: Leppanen, Jere (Nokia - FI/Espoo) <jere.leppanen@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> I don't know what to do with this patch.
>
> There seems to be some discussion about a potential alternative approach
> to the fix, but there were problems with that suggestion.
>
> Please advise, thank you.
Please drop it. As you noticed, we do need more discussions around
it. Thanks.
