Re: [PATCH] net: introduce ip_local_unbindable_ports sysctl

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 09:00:19PM +0100, Maciej Żenczykowski wrote:
...
> I'm of the opinion that SELinux and other security policy modules
> should be reserved for things related to system wide security policy.
> Not for things that are more along the lines of 'functionality'.

Makes sense.

> 
> Also selinux has 'permissive' mode which causes the system to ignore
> all selinux access controls (in favour of just logging) and this is
> what is commonly used during development (because it's such a pain to
> work with).

Agree, this would be a big problem.
IOW, "you don't have permission to access to this" != "you just can't use this, no
matter what"

FWIW, I rest my case :-)

Thanks,
Marcelo



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux