On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 11:24:21PM +0800, Xin Long wrote:
> Transport should use its own pf_retrans to do the error_count
> check, instead of asoc's. Otherwise, it's meaningless to make
> pf_retrans per transport.
>
> Fixes: 5aa93bcf66f4 ("sctp: Implement quick failover draft from tsvwg")
> Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
> index 1cf5bb5..e52b212 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
> @@ -547,7 +547,7 @@ static void sctp_do_8_2_transport_strike(struct sctp_cmd_seq *commands,
> if (net->sctp.pf_enable &&
> (transport->state == SCTP_ACTIVE) &&
> (transport->error_count < transport->pathmaxrxt) &&
> - (transport->error_count > asoc->pf_retrans)) {
> + (transport->error_count > transport->pf_retrans)) {
>
> sctp_assoc_control_transport(asoc, transport,
> SCTP_TRANSPORT_PF,
> --
> 2.1.0
>
>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
