On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 2:38 AM David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > From: Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2019 07:31:18 -0500 > > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 10:39:41PM -0200, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 07:58:07PM +0100, Tuxdriver wrote: > >> > I was initially under the impression that with Kent's repost, the radixtree > >> > (which is what I think you meant by rhashtables) updates would be merged > >> > >> Oops! Yep.. I had meant flex_arrays actually. > >> > >> > imminently, but that doesn't seem to be the case. I'd really like to know > >> > what the hold up there is, as that patch seems to have been stalled for > >> > months. I hate the notion of breaking the radixtree patch, but if it's > >> > status is indeterminate, then, yes, we probably need to go with xins patch > >> > for the short term, and let Kent fix it up in due course. > >> > >> Dave, can you please consider applying this patch? The conflict > >> resolution will be easy: just ignore the changes introduced by this > >> patch. > >> > > Dave I concur with Marcelo here. Kent was very active in getting sctp fixed up > > to use radixtrees, but now he seems to have gone to ground, and for whatever > > reason, no one seems interested in incorporating his patch. Its been languising > > for months, so I think we need to take action to secure sctp now until such time > > as his genradix changes finally move forward. > > I agree, please let's get this sctp patch resubmitted and back into > patchwork and I will apply it. reposted.
