On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 12:29:26PM -0200, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 04:00:21PM -0500, Kent Overstreet wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 12:50:01PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > On Mon, 17 Dec 2018 08:19:28 -0500 Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > @@ -535,9 +470,6 @@ int sctp_send_add_streams(struct sctp_association *asoc, > > > > goto out; > > > > } > > > > > > > > - stream->incnt = incnt; > > > > - stream->outcnt = outcnt; > > > > - > > > > asoc->strreset_outstanding = !!out + !!in; > > > > > > > > > > I'm seeing a reject here for some reason. Using todays's linux-next, > > > but there are no changes against net/sctp/stream.c in -next. The > > > assignment to stream->incnt has disappeared. I did this: > > > > > > @@ -535,8 +470,6 @@ int sctp_send_add_streams(struct sctp_as > > > goto out; > > > } > > > > > > - stream->outcnt = outcnt; > > > - > > > asoc->strreset_outstanding = !!out + !!in; > > > > > > out: > > > > > > > > > We're at 4.20-rc7 and this series is rather large. I'll merge them all > > > to see what happens, but I don't think it's 4.21-rc1 material? > > > > Yeah, agreed. Thanks! > > Ping? Where did this go? > As I recall kent reposted his series convirting flex_arrays to radix trees such that it included sctp's uses. I think xin needs to repost the sctp reallocation patch to make use of those radix trees appropriately still (assuming any additional work still needs to be done) Neil > Marcelo >
