From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 00:16:58 +0800
> What do you think of:
>
> static int sctp_v6_cmp_addr(const union sctp_addr *addr1,
> const union sctp_addr *addr2)
> {
> return __sctp_v6_cmp_addr(addr1, addr2) &&
> addr1->v6.sin_port == addr2->v6.sin_port;
> }
>
> (v6.sin_port and v4.sin_port have the same offset in union sctp_addr,
> we've exploited this in many places in SCTP)
>From my perspective this is OK.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
