On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 02:19:03PM -0500, Paul Moore wrote: > On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 3:52 PM, Richard Haines > <richard_c_haines@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > These patches have been built on Fedora 27 with kernel-4.16.0-0.rc1 plus > > the following userspace patches to enable testing: > > > > 1) Updates to libsepol 2.7 to support the sctp portcon statement. > > The patch is available from: > > http://arctic.selinuxproject.org/~rhaines/selinux-sctp/ > > selinux-Add-support-for-the-SCTP-portcon-keyword.patch > > > > 2) Updates to the SELinux Test Suite adding SCTP tests. Please read the > > selinux-testsuite/README.sctp for details. The patch is available from: > > http://arctic.selinuxproject.org/~rhaines/selinux-sctp/ > > selinux-testsuite-Add-SCTP-test-support.patch > > > > 3) Updates to lksctp-tools that show SELinux info in sctp_darn and > > sctp_test. It also contains a minor patch for test_1_to_1_connect.c > > as when CIPSO/CALIPSO configured, NetLabel returns a different error > > code for illegal addresses in test 5. The patch is available from: > > http://arctic.selinuxproject.org/~rhaines/selinux-sctp/ > > lksctp-tools-Add-SELinux-support-to-sctp_test-and-sc.patch > > > > All SCTP lksctp-tools/src/func_tests run correctly in enforcing mode. > > > > All SCTP regression tests "./sctp-tests run" run correctly in enforcing > > mode. These tests are obtained from: https://github.com/sctp/sctp-tests > > > > The selinux-testsuite patch also adds remote tests (that need some manual > > configuration). These are useful for testing CIPSO/CALIPSO over a network > > with a number of categories to produce large ip option fields with various > > message sizes forcing fragmentation etc.. > > > > Changes since RFC Patch: > > Removed the NetLabel patch (was [RFC PATCH 4/5] netlabel: Add SCTP support) > > as re-engineered. However this patchset will require the NetLabel > > patch at [1] to fully run the SCTP selinux-testsuite. > > > > V1 Changes: > > PATCH 1/4 > > Remove unused parameter from security_sctp_assoc_request(). > > Reformat and update LSM-sctp.rst documentation. > > PATCH 2/4 > > Add variables and RCU locks as requested in [2] to support IP options. > > PATCH 3/4 > > Added security_sctp_assoc_request() hook to sctp_sf_do_unexpected_init() > > and sctp_sf_do_5_2_4_dupcook(). > > Removed security_sctp_assoc_request() hook from sctp_sf_do_5_1C_ack() as > > no longer required. > > PATCH 4/4 > > Reformat and update SELinux-sctp.rst documentation. > > Remove bindx and connectx permissions. > > Rework selinux_socket_connect() and selinux_netlbl_socket_connect() to > > utilise helpers for code reuse. > > Add spinlock to selinux_sctp_assoc_request(). > > Remove unused parameter from security_sctp_assoc_request(). > > Use address->sa_family == AF_INET in *_bind and *_connect to ensure > > correct address type. > > Minor cleanups. > > > > V2 Changes: > > PATCH 4/4 - Remove spin lock from selinux_sctp_assoc_request() > > PATCH 4/4 - Fix selinux_sctp_sk_clone() kbuild test robot catch [3] > > > > V3 Changes: > > PATCH 2/4 - Account for IP options length in sctp.h sctp_frag_point() by > > Marcelo > > > > V4 Changes: > > PATCH 1/4 - Move specific SELinux descriptions from LSM-sctp.rst and > > lsm_hooks.h to SELinux-sctp.rst in PATCH 4/4 > > PATCH 4/4 - Rename selinux_netlbl_sctp_socket_connect() to > > selinux_netlbl_socket_connect_locked() and move description comments to > > selinux_sctp_bind_connect() > > > > V5 Change: Rework selinux_netlbl_socket_connect() and > > selinux_netlbl_socket_connect_locked as requested by Paul. > > > > V6 Changes: > > Rework SCTP patches 2/4 and 3/4 as there have been major SCTP updates since > > kernel 4.14. > > > > [1] https://marc.info/?l=selinux&m=151061619115945&w=2 > > [2] https://marc.info/?l=selinux&m=150962470215797&w=2 > > [3] https://marc.info/?l=selinux&m=151198281817779&w=2 > > > > Richard Haines (4): > > security: Add support for SCTP security hooks > > sctp: Add ip option support > > sctp: Add LSM hooks > > selinux: Add SCTP support > > Marcelo, or any other SCTP folks, do the SCTP changes still look okay > to you? I'd like to merge these into the selinux/next tree by the end > of the week ... Other than the issue on patch 2/4, patchset LGTM yes. (Not really happy with the casts to remove the const attribute on patch 3, but I don't see other way out) Thanks, Marcelo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
