On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 08:37:49AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote: > On Tue, 2017-08-15 at 12:05 -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > > > Ok, but I should see a difference in the generated code, right? > > Depends on the compiler. Have you tried older versions ? > This was with gcc 6.4.1, fc25 standard. Only tested with it and didn't check clang either. > One argument is that following struct member definition eases code > review. > > (It is easier to catch a field init is missing) And a good one, yes. Thanks, Marcelo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
