Re: SCTP MSG_MORE code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 1:49 AM, David Laight <David.Laight@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Something needs to be done with SCTP MSG_MORE before the end of the rc cycle.
> The current code is definitely broken.
agreed.

>
> I objected to the last 'fix' patch because it clears the flag is a place where
> I don't think it is necessary to do so - so could generate extra ethernet frames.
>
Sorry, can you double check the last 'fix' patch ?
I could not get 'generate extra ethernet frames'.

if we keep sending data with "MSG_MORE", after one ethernet frame
is sent, "followed by a second ethernet frame with 1 chunk in it" will NOT
happen, as in this loop the asoc's msg_more flag is still set, and this flush
is called by sctp_sendmsg(the function msg_more should care more).


If your point about "generate extra ethernet frames"  is right, sure, I will
change the way to fix that. but before this, pls check it again, appreciate it.

>         David
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux