Since commit 7fda702f9315 ("sctp: use new rhlist interface on sctp transport
rhashtable"), sctp has changed to use rhlist_lookup to look up transport, but
rhlist_lookup doesn't call rcu_read_lock inside, unlike rhashtable_lookup_fast.
It is called in sctp_epaddr_lookup_transport and sctp_addrs_lookup_transport.
sctp_addrs_lookup_transport is always in the protection of rcu_read_lock(),
as __sctp_lookup_association is called in rx path or sctp_lookup_association
which are in the protection of rcu_read_lock() already.
But sctp_epaddr_lookup_transport is called by sctp_endpoint_lookup_assoc, it
doesn't call rcu_read_lock, which may cause "suspicious rcu_dereference_check
usage' in __rhashtable_lookup.
This patch is to fix it by adding rcu_read_lock in sctp_endpoint_lookup_assoc
before calling sctp_epaddr_lookup_transport.
Fixes: 7fda702f9315 ("sctp: use new rhlist interface on sctp transport rhashtable")
Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@xxxxxxxxx>
---
net/sctp/endpointola.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/sctp/endpointola.c b/net/sctp/endpointola.c
index 1f03065..410ddc1 100644
--- a/net/sctp/endpointola.c
+++ b/net/sctp/endpointola.c
@@ -331,7 +331,9 @@ struct sctp_association *sctp_endpoint_lookup_assoc(
* on this endpoint.
*/
if (!ep->base.bind_addr.port)
- goto out;
+ return NULL;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
t = sctp_epaddr_lookup_transport(ep, paddr);
if (!t)
goto out;
@@ -339,6 +341,7 @@ struct sctp_association *sctp_endpoint_lookup_assoc(
*transport = t;
asoc = t->asoc;
out:
+ rcu_read_unlock();
return asoc;
}
--
2.1.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
